Macrolog

Kong Bomb?

A little over a week ago I went with Dave No Spaces to see the big Peter Jackson remake of King Kong. Dave loved it, but I wasn’t so enthused.

I mean it was alright as big action-adventure event movies go, but it’s no bar-raiser. Sure, it’s no ‘Kong Bomb’ (as some cynical critics have quipped) either, but it didn’t inspire in me anything like the kind of awe experienced by Tom Coates, and I can’t concur with Kottke’s amazement. In fact, the parts they seem to have enjoyed the most bored me after a few minutes. Also, I hate insects.

In Peter Jackson’s defense, it didn’t feel at all like a three-hour movie (I only checked my watch three times, which is a personal record), yet there were too many points where I was impatient for something to happen to propel the story, which itself fell apart for me in the final act (I had much more sympathy for Adrien Brody’s character than for that bloody monkey; somehow I don’t think that was the intention).

As for the cast? The intentionally hammy acting was a gamble that works, in my opinion, and the cast was well chosen. But in hindsight Jack Black may have been an ill fit. Not that he’s a bad actor or anything of the sort, however he’s pretty much typecast as himself. Whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing is open to interpretation.

On the plus side, though I was disappointed by the footage in the trailer I saw in November, the CGI Kong looked surprisingly impressive (outside of the action scenes, at least). Even better was the New York cityscape that filled the screen at the film’s conclusion. The attention to detail is astounding; I could have sworn it was real. Plus, the philosophical subtext (the whole ‘giant of one world is dwarfed by another’ thing) brought some depth to what is essentially a popcorn movie, though it was kind of hard to miss.

And I confess, I marked out for the ‘Sumatran Rat Monkey’ sign in the background. Nice touch, that.

Tue 27 Dec 2005 at 15:22 ·

Comments (2 responses so far)

Open

Posted by Eoin
Wed 28 Dec 2005
at 18:55

I hate insects too. Who likes them? But surely the point is that you don’t like them, thus maxamising on your discomfort when they arrive en masse.

Plus, I don’t think it was the intention to portray Kong as loveable and as Brody as despiseable. The film tries to blur the boundaries between antagonist and protagonist, which in turn makes Kong more than a beast or a cuddly toy.

My biggest problem is the pointless character of Jimmy, the ship’s resident scamp. Surely, we could have done without his cockney ways?

Posted by No Spaces Dave
Thu 29 Dec 2005
at 04:30

I don’t like being referrd to as ‘Dave No Spaces’, I’d prefer to be known as ‘Dave R’, or ‘Cool Dave’ or even ‘No Spaces Dave’ or heck even just ‘Dave’, or well, maybe ‘Cool Dave’ will suffice but anyway, King Kong was cool, was better then any Lord of the Rings movies, and I spent less time being amazed by the special effects and more time being amazed at how during the entire movie, Anna…Cracktrow or whatever her name was, with her low cut shirt, there was no down top action at all; no (blah, I hate the phrase) nipple-slips going on…unreal! I spent three hours looking for one! Not a peep! That’s the sign of a good director…

About

qrcode This is the personal website of MacDara Conroy, a twenty-something production editor living in Dublin, Ireland. Read more »

Details

You are reading Kong Bomb?, a Macrolog entry by MacDara Conroy. It is filed under Sound & Screen, and was published in December 2005.

Tags: film kingkong movies peterjackson review

Continuum

↑ Sat 31 Dec 2005 at 20:52
→ Tue 27 Dec 2005 at 15:22
↓ Fri 11 Nov 2005 at 13:53

MacDara Conroy: Self, aggregated