Hello, world. I’m MacDara Conroy, and this is my blog.


Date: December 2013

God Needs a Hobby

"Thirty-six hours on the road — and in the bar — with exiled TV genius Dan Harmon." Though of course now he's exiled no more. But that shouldn't take much away from this interview, conducted while Harmon and co took the Harmontown podcast across America earlier this year (a jaunt that put me months behind on my listening, oy). #link

###

J Robert Lennon on the Ass-In-the-Chair Canard

"The phrase is in fact an insult to almost everyone who has ever struggled with the creative process, and as a teaching tool is liable to do more harm than good. It embraces several dangerous lies: that writer's block is the result, first and foremost, of laziness; that writing (indeed, any creative pursuit) is like any other form of labor; and that how hard you work on something is directly correlated with how good it is." This times infinity. #link

###

A Very Dirty Lens: How Can We Listen to Offensive Metal?

Some interesting points here; it's easy for a long-time extreme metal listener such as myself to brush aside Cannibal Corpse's grotesquery under the rug of irony, but at the same time it's clear that's an inspiration for the inexcusably everything-ist 'sexually angry death metal' (copyright Jamie Grimes) purveyed by Devourment and their 'slamming' death metal ilk (I'm not even going near pornogrind). #link

###

Is There a Word for That?

"Despite the best efforts of Samuel Johnson, Jonathan Swift, et al., there has never been a governing body that approves “correct” English. Unlike French, say, or Japanese, English is an open-source language. Anyone is free to suggest new words or phrases. The only criterion for their success is that users adopt them." And that's why I persist in using 'alright' instead of 'all right'. Alright? #link

###

Isn't there a computer program for that?

No, 'subeditor' does not mean 'spellchecker'. It means pretty much everything Andy Bodle describes here; it's an often thankless task but one I love doing (provided I'm subbing stuff that's written by someone who cares about what they write). #link

###

Pencils Down: Know When to Stop Editing

Good advice here, which ultimately boils down to taking ego out of the situation. Everybody wants their bloody stamp on something, but that's almost always to the detriment of the thing itself, which should be the only focus. Too many cooks spoil the broth. #link

###

Telling women to be careful gets men off the hook

"Women should be free to talk to whomever they choose and go wherever they want without threat of assault. Men have the choice to either create this freedom, or uphold the threat." The thing is that it feels like everybody needs to be guarded and vigilant but it's only women who seem to get berated with that message, mostly by men, which is funny because the stats are pretty clear. Whenever I feel defensive about this -- you know, I wouldn't walk through town on my own in the middle of the night, there's threat around every corner, whatever -- I have to catch myself and remember that it really is worse for women. I still think anyone who gets so shit-faced drunk that they have no idea what they're getting into is fucking stupid, because we clearly don't live in a perfect world where we can do that without blundering into danger we would otherwise avoid. But that often turns straight into victim blaming -- especially when the victim is a woman -- which immediately clouds the issue and is so damaging because, let's face it, the bastards who take advantage of these situations are the only ones to blame. The onus shouldn't be on the victim when the one perpetrating the crime -- any crime -- could choose not to do it. #link

###

The Out Door: The Legacy of Loren Connors

Pitchfork's outer-limits column takes a look at the oeuvre of the idiosyncratic guitarists, whom I've read about for years but never properly listened to. I hope this rectifies that for me and for you. #link

###

Pullman v. Casserly: The future of copyright

Copyright is broken only insofar as the media industries' use of it as a weapon is destructive to everyone, makers of things and the people who enjoy them alike. Meanwhile, the arguments for and against come from very different places. Pullman makes a sympathetic case, showing his proper understanding of the chains of production that get the words he writes to the people who read them, but he's perhaps naive to ignore that he and other creatives should be getting a better deal from their publishers for what they do. Casserly highlights one example of a better deal: authors bypassing the traditional system to market their wares themselves, and often making a good living out of it. But she's also naive in assuming that's something everyone can achieve. For instance, Cory Doctorow isn't just successful because he's a gifted and hard-working writer; his editorship of the highly trafficked web culture blog Boing Boing played no small role in his success, too. Would he be where is is today were it not for already having significant visibility among the bulk of the audience that pays for his work? I doubt it. #link

###