Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
“Now – I’m not down on wrestling fans, but fans don’t know what they want. They shouldn’t know. That’s not their job. Their job is to come and be entertained – and hopefully be tricked – so they’re elated with adrenaline rushing through their body.”
Now there’s a distinct whiff of bullshit from many of Gary Hart’s words in this memoir of his life and times as a wrestling manager in the territory days, and later in the Crockett/Turner NWA. It’s impossible to escape the notion that the reader is constantly being worked, as he contradicts himself from page to page as the circumstances demand.
But every now and then there’s a glimpse of wisdom that stands out for its crystal clarity. And it’s those, as well as the general entertainment value of reading Hart tell his stories no matter how much he might be kayfabing you, that make this worth seeking out for any dyed-in-the-wool wrestling fan.
###
Alright! This is great stuff, even if it's permissive of misheard word-manglings that annoy me so. But perhaps the bigger takeaway is that so much grammar pedantry seems to revolve around a general misapprehension of the concept of metaphors, or satire (take 'guesstimate', which I've always taken to be poking fun at the puffed-up, self-delusional business-world redefinition of a 'guess', whether educated or not, as an 'estimate', with all the mental labour rigour that implies.) #link
###
Decent advice here. See also: Plotto; A New Method of Plot Suggestion for Writers of Creative Fiction (from 1928!) #link
###
This is great stuff. But one cannot talk about the British short story without also mentioning its Irish cousin. #link
###
Worldbuilding Stack Exchange "is a question and answer site for writers/artists using science, geography and culture to construct imaginary worlds and settings." A golden resource for fiction writers/creators, here. #link
###
Be sure to read to the end; that's the real kicker. [c/o Kottke] #link
###
Useful motivation tips, here. #link
###
Save your groans, pun-haters! #link
###
This is great stuff here, even if it's a little too accepting of how laziness and ignorance are shaping language (I'm thinking of things like 'alot', or 'of' when people mean 'have', not dialectic differences like 'ax' for 'ask'). #link
###
I've said it before and I'll say it again: you have to know the rules (whether useful for clarity, or bullshit class-enforcing myths) before you can break them. #link
###
Worth bearing in mind for film criticism, too. #link
###
"Ernest Cline’s Armada is everything wrong with gaming culture wrapped up in one soon-to-be–best-selling novel." Ugh, it's basically everything I hated about Cline's previous. Safe to assume the new one is similarly unimaginative, propped up by the same try-hard yet lazy-ass references. Fuck off already! #link
###
Hear, hear! #link
###
Another one for the reading pile, probably when I get back into Banks' oeuvre. #link
###
This is fantastic: a graphic biography of the Village Voice co-founder that's been running since 2012, with chapters posted occasionally at Boing Boing. #link
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Power Slam is truly missed – I never missed an issue from number 14 till the end last summer – and this compendium of editor/writer Findlay Martin’s insights on what was happening in wrestling’s major (and almost major) leagues over the last two decades beings back all those fond memories of poring over my monthly mag. I’m not sure if it’s appealing to anyone unfamiliar with Power Slam, as Martin also delves a fair amount into the nuts and bolts of production of the mag, but for me it’s like Christmas come early.
###
Like Jason Kottke, I too have only read Underworld; I'm guessing I should give White Noise a go sometime. #link
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Yes! is a curiously slight volume considering Daniel Bryan’s storied career in the pro wrestling business, but being a WWE-sanctioned book it was bound to be fed through their filter, and cast his many years on the indie circuit and in Japan as mere preparatory work before hitting the ‘big time’. Sure, he’s allowed some leeway in his interpretation of events, because otherwise would make the exercise entirely pointless, but he’s an avowedly private and guarded individual, which doesn’t leave much space for a revelatory memoir on a par with Mick Foley’s Have A Nice Day. That’s not helped by a structure that interweaves Bryan’s memories leading up to WrestleMania XXX with WWE.com editor Craig Tello’s laboured ‘PR pretending to be a literary sportswriter’ prose, waffling on the behind-the-scenes happenings at that very event. With a more encouraging editor, there’s a better book in Bryan, I’m sure.
###
"[Once] a thing is said, even if it is taken back immediately, it can’t be unsaid: the impression it makes on an audience remains, undiminished." So there. #link
###
Is there an Irish equivalent? Certainly we have our own folklore and cultural history, but stories of mischievous faeries and the like don't really compare to the dread inspired by the ghosts of England's heritage. The closest local connection I can make is the music (and presentation) of From the Bogs of Aughiska but I'm probably missing the blindingly obvious. #link
###
Burkeman suggests scheduling regular times for reading, but in my experience, you either want to read or you don't. And even then you want to read this or that; it's not a coin toss. #link
###
They might not sell the big numbers, but I've always been a fan of the short story, and Ireland's long produced masters of the form. #link
###
I always thought this was Irish slang that crossed over. They say it 'entered English in the late 1800s' but they don't cite from where... #link
###
Knowing there are people at universities doing actual creative writing degrees who write that badly make me feel pretty good about myself, y'know? It's not quite schadenfreude but I'm sure there's a German compound word for it. #link
###
In The New Yorker, John McPhee reminds writers to put the reader first when choosing their references or turns of phrase. Context, yes? [c/o @burn_amb]. #link
###
I’ve had it for something like 15 or 16 years now — the pound sign on the Hodges Figgis price sticker is a giveaway — and I was in the mood for a memoir/diary-type book to read, so I relieved this one from its tsundoku status in my bedside locker a few months ago.
Was it worth reading before seeing Apocalypse Now? I think so. I mean I’ve seen most of the film, in parts, and I know the gist of the story; it’s just that I’ve never sat down and watched the whole thing through. With perspective, I don’t think I was ready for it before — I certainly didn’t have the patience for a three-hour treatise on war and existentialism the night I first saw (some of) it — but I feel primed for it now, having read Eleanor Coppola’s thoughts on and around its making.
More…
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Box Brown’s remarkable manga-influenced sequential art biography of the wrestling legend lies somewhere at the intersection of the graphic novel as pioneered by Art Spiegelman, the confessional comics of Harvey Pekar and the illustrated reportage of Joe Sacco. Okay, that sounds as grandiose as a wrestling promo, but there’s truth in it. What we have here is a larger-than-life story that could be told in text alone, but it’s a tale that really benefits from being seen sketched out on the page to be believed – even if much of it’s a work in the end.
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
More good stuff from Vaughan and Staples, who appear to have developed the perfect partnership of plot, imagery and dialogue with their jointly realised world. I’ll be picking up Volume Four as soon as I can find it.
###
Lots of inspiration here. Also: maybe expand that timeline to three months and I've got a reachable ambition [c/o Interconnected, filtered]. #link
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Amy Poehler makes it clear from the start of this book that it’s not much of a memoir or autobiography, more a disjointed collection of essays, musings and reminiscences. And that’s exactly how Yes Please should be judged, especially as its later pages see her try to draw a portrait of herself beyond the comedic image that’s naturally earnest but, in my case, not much fun to read. It’s still worth a go anyway, because Poehler is an awesome person. And she doesn’t hold her cards as close to her chest as Tina Fey.
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Another fun compendium of Richard Herring’s daily blog posts, plus bonus commentary with eight years of hindsight. I hope he gets around to putting out more of these at some point.
###
Writers discuss working around their day jobs. #link
###
Can't get your head around it? That's precisely the point. #link
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
My first Discworld novel, and a jolly good one it is too, affectionately satirising print journalism amid a noir-ish whodunnit plot. I’ll even forgive Terry Pratchett for refusing to pick an ending (he strings four or five of them together here) because the writing is so charming. Thanks for the tip, Bee.
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
They said it was as good as the show, and they were right. It’s a comic aimed at kids, for sure, but nothing’s watered down, the humour’s just as surreal, with that same vein of pathos running deep throughout. Fantastic stuff.
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
David Shoemaker’s book-length adaptation of his ‘Dead Wrestler of the Week’ column for Deadspin could do with another pass by a copy editor more familiar with the subject matter (I wasn’t even looking out for them but there are at least two glaring timeline botches in the text). It also leans a little too heavily on the Barthes quotes to square a generally low-brow pursuit with a high-brown mindset. Still, as an intro aimed at the curious to explain why long-time fans like me still carry the torch, it does the job. In other words, you don’t need to be into wrestling to read it; in fact, it’s probably better if you aren’t.
###
"An editor may be butcher, but they are also a midwife, a parent, a nanny, a matron, a therapist, a conspirator and a friend. But don't forget that, in the end, only a butcher can turn a live, stamping, snorting, animal into something you can stomach. So perhaps it's time we heard it for the butchers." #link
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Kate Bishop’s west coast adventures are a little too sunny, a little too wacky to fit comfortably in the same series as Clint Barton’s relatively serious situation in Brooklyn. Annie Wu’s more conventional art style is fairly jarring compared to David Aja’s stylised look, too. The Kate issues work better separated out in this volume, though it’s far from perfect, with the story arc resolving itself awfully neatly. Still, the writing is witty enough to paper over those cracks for the most part.
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
Stewart Lee’s autobiography of sorts is part memoir (only a fraction, really, more a summary than an in-depth examination of his life and career), part director’s commentary on three of his own extended stand-up sets (making up the bulk of this tome, and what really makes it worth reading). How you like it of course depends upon how you like his comedy, but I’ve been a fan of his (and of Richard Herring) since the TMWRNJ days so I’ve been primed for more than 15 years.
###
Reblogged from my Goodreads list:
I feel it’s premature to judge this on its own with two more parts of the trilogy (really one book split in three, since they’ve been published so close together) still to go. But I will say that it’s been a long time since I’ve read anything like this, and I look forward to seeing where Jeff VanderMeer takes the story.
###
Seriously, this isn't about pedantry: it's about written language meaning something. With a tongue as homophone-filled and context-dependant as English, these basic rules are necessary. No excuses! #link
###
English is already full of loan words, and plenty of made-up ones; why not add more? #link
###
Reblogged from my GoodReads list:
More a collection of columns loosely connected by Kermode’s overall thesis that film criticism (if not high-calibre criticism in general) is still necessary in this age of media democratisation. I mean I’m obviously sympathetic to that, being a writer on music and film myself and a blogger (on and off) of some 13 years’ standing. I think you have to be on board with that notion to get what he’s doing. Moreover, his structure allows him to meander around and away from the topic at hand to sometimes completely irrelevant places. But his style is fluid and fun for the most part, and some of his apparently scattershot musings do make more sense at the end.
###
More great advice from Guardian subeditor David Marsh. See also: In defence of 'basically' #link
###
"It tolls for those whom don't know the difference between 'who' and 'whom'" (NB sticking this here so I won't forget it!) #link
###
A competition for short stories inspired by quantum theory; worth a serious look when the winners are announced. [c/o Tor.com] #link
###
"Despite the best efforts of Samuel Johnson, Jonathan Swift, et al., there has never been a governing body that approves “correct” English. Unlike French, say, or Japanese, English is an open-source language. Anyone is free to suggest new words or phrases. The only criterion for their success is that users adopt them." And that's why I persist in using 'alright' instead of 'all right'. Alright? #link
###
The Guardian's supplement for last year's NaNoWriMo. Good tips for any writing project, though. #link
###
He might be happy, but I'm not. What he sees as a utility premium I see as stuff that should be taken as a given when it comes to digital media. Believing you're getting better value in paying more for something you 'don't have to carry around' is exactly what publishers want you to think. At the end of the day you're still paying over the odds straight into the company's profits since they don't have to spend as much on printing, shipping, etc. And what's more, writers' royalty agreements certainly don't give them a bigger share of that profit pie (at least not yet). #link
###
Mostly common sense although I disagree with the need for a comma after 'Des Moines, Iowa' as its absence introduces no awkwardness or ambiguity. #link
###