In a post-script to my piece on the Ultimate Warrior last week, here’s someone else with something to say about this Daniel Flynn character.
And here’s the referenced article by Flynn that serves as further evidence that he doesn’t really know what he’s talking about.
(Take note how he refers to The Guardian as the Manchester Guardian – an attempt to downgrade the scope, quality and stature of said newspaper, maybe? Or possibly proof that he’s just lazy when it comes to research, which doesn’t reflect very well on someone to whom facts are so precious, does it?)